<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PersuasiveConcepts.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19337</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19337</guid>
		<description>To me as well! I&#039;m working on one right now called The hierarchy of social connections. Ill be quoting your weaker ties post in that one. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me as well! I&#039;m working on one right now called The hierarchy of social connections. Ill be quoting your weaker ties post in that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19336</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19336</guid>
		<description>I will be checking out that post as soon as I get home this evening, thank you for sharing Buddy! The power of positive win-win relationships has been overlooked for the ego boost of quantity.  
 
Sure, it takes more time to build a strong connection but one well worth the effort. Thank you again for sharing and for the comment! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be checking out that post as soon as I get home this evening, thank you for sharing Buddy! The power of positive win-win relationships has been overlooked for the ego boost of quantity.  </p>
<p>Sure, it takes more time to build a strong connection but one well worth the effort. Thank you again for sharing and for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19302</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19302</guid>
		<description>To me as well! I&#039;m working on one right now called The hierarchy of social connections. Ill be quoting your weaker ties post in that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me as well! I&#8217;m working on one right now called The hierarchy of social connections. Ill be quoting your weaker ties post in that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by Buddy Hodges</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19300</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19300</guid>
		<description>David, 
 
Your post is dear to my heart, because it is the mission of my blog to &quot;Turn Friends and Followers Into Real Relationships.&quot; 
 
You have explained the reasons well. You asked for other reasons. One is the happiness that comes from real friendship. 
 
I re-tweeted your blog post yesterday. Thanks for bringing this issue to the attention of your readers. 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://relatingonline.com/archives/721&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Interdependence vs. Independence Reconsidered&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, </p>
<p>Your post is dear to my heart, because it is the mission of my blog to &quot;Turn Friends and Followers Into Real Relationships.&quot; </p>
<p>You have explained the reasons well. You asked for other reasons. One is the happiness that comes from real friendship. </p>
<p>I re-tweeted your blog post yesterday. Thanks for bringing this issue to the attention of your readers.<br />
My recent post <a href="http://relatingonline.com/archives/721" rel="nofollow">Interdependence vs. Independence Reconsidered</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19240</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19240</guid>
		<description>I will be checking out that post as soon as I get home this evening, thank you for sharing Buddy! The power of positive win-win relationships has been overlooked for the ego boost of quantity. 

Sure, it takes more time to build a strong connection but one well worth the effort. Thank you again for sharing and for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be checking out that post as soon as I get home this evening, thank you for sharing Buddy! The power of positive win-win relationships has been overlooked for the ego boost of quantity. </p>
<p>Sure, it takes more time to build a strong connection but one well worth the effort. Thank you again for sharing and for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by Buddy Hodges</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19232</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19232</guid>
		<description>David, 
 
Thanks for your excellent discussion of this topic. You asked for &quot;other reasons.&quot; I believe that deep relationships are inherently valuable, per se. We are, after all, social creatures, and we do love to love and be loved.  
 
The issue of depth in social media relationships is the main theme of my blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://RelatingOnline.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://RelatingOnline.com&lt;/a&gt;. Like Brent, I agree that quality relationships with &quot;Friends&quot; &quot;Followers&quot; and &quot;Connections&quot; are more valuable and more likely to produce real networking results. My work in social media is focused on &quot;Turning Friends and Followers into Real Relationships.&quot; 
 
However, there is another side to the issue that Sociologist Granoveter called, &quot;The Strength of Weak Ties.&quot; Close friends tend to know the same people and things we know. The concept is explained in my blog post::  &lt;a href=&quot;http://relatingonline.com/archives/266&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://relatingonline.com/archives/266&lt;/a&gt; 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://relatingonline.com/archives/721&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Interdependence vs. Independence Reconsidered&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, </p>
<p>Thanks for your excellent discussion of this topic. You asked for &quot;other reasons.&quot; I believe that deep relationships are inherently valuable, per se. We are, after all, social creatures, and we do love to love and be loved.  </p>
<p>The issue of depth in social media relationships is the main theme of my blog: <a href="http://RelatingOnline.com" rel="nofollow">http://RelatingOnline.com</a>. Like Brent, I agree that quality relationships with &quot;Friends&quot; &quot;Followers&quot; and &quot;Connections&quot; are more valuable and more likely to produce real networking results. My work in social media is focused on &quot;Turning Friends and Followers into Real Relationships.&quot; </p>
<p>However, there is another side to the issue that Sociologist Granoveter called, &quot;The Strength of Weak Ties.&quot; Close friends tend to know the same people and things we know. The concept is explained in my blog post::  <a href="http://relatingonline.com/archives/266" rel="nofollow">http://relatingonline.com/archives/266</a><br />
My recent post <a href="http://relatingonline.com/archives/721" rel="nofollow">Interdependence vs. Independence Reconsidered</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19134</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19134</guid>
		<description>Truer words have never been spoken Brent! I still fall into the more is better rut every now and then; it can be a temporary ego boost when I look at other people and see that I have more Twitter followers, LinkedIn connections, circles or Facebook friends. Of course I know that&#039;s wrong because it&#039;s in the quality of the connection that the real value of social networking occurs. Thank you for commenting, keep up the excellent work!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truer words have never been spoken Brent! I still fall into the more is better rut every now and then; it can be a temporary ego boost when I look at other people and see that I have more Twitter followers, LinkedIn connections, circles or Facebook friends. Of course I know that&#039;s wrong because it&#039;s in the quality of the connection that the real value of social networking occurs. Thank you for commenting, keep up the excellent work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons To Aim For Social Depth Over Social Breadth by Brent Albrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/social-media/5-reasons-to-aim-for-social-depth-over-social-breadth/comment-page-1/#comment-19132</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Albrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1237#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>David, excellent blog and excellent points.  We talk about quality over quantity all the time, and then ignore it trying to see how many fans and followers we can get.  One of the biggest benefits of social media is supposed to be its viral potential, but when all we collect is a large audience of strangers with nothing in common, how inclined are they to share anything and so the viral benefit is lost.  Too many people want immediate gratification - I want 10,000 close connections today - but that&#039;s impossible, so instead of accepting that and building relationships one at a time, they decide to collect 10,000 strangers and pretend they have a relationship with them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, excellent blog and excellent points.  We talk about quality over quantity all the time, and then ignore it trying to see how many fans and followers we can get.  One of the biggest benefits of social media is supposed to be its viral potential, but when all we collect is a large audience of strangers with nothing in common, how inclined are they to share anything and so the viral benefit is lost.  Too many people want immediate gratification &#8211; I want 10,000 close connections today &#8211; but that&#039;s impossible, so instead of accepting that and building relationships one at a time, they decide to collect 10,000 strangers and pretend they have a relationship with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Worst Dealership I&#8217;ve Ever Seen, Is It You? by David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/mundane-wisdom/the-worst-dealership-ive-ever-seen-is-it-you/comment-page-1/#comment-19125</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1226#comment-19125</guid>
		<description>Very true! Thank you for the comment!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true! Thank you for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Worst Dealership I&#8217;ve Ever Seen, Is It You? by Bharat</title>
		<link>http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/mundane-wisdom/the-worst-dealership-ive-ever-seen-is-it-you/comment-page-1/#comment-19117</link>
		<dc:creator>Bharat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.persuasiveconcepts.com/?p=1226#comment-19117</guid>
		<description>unsatisfied employees leads to misearies and further leads to unhappy cutomers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unsatisfied employees leads to misearies and further leads to unhappy cutomers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

